Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harris v. Southern Carbon Co., 162 So. 430.
-
Gorbach v. Prager, Inc.
300 So. 2d 618
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
He relies especially on the cases of York v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
- Jennings v. Louisiana and Southern Life Ins. Co. 290 So. 2d 811 La. 1974
-
Gaspard v. Petroservice, Inc.
266 So. 2d 453
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
2 Cir., ], supra, would constitute judicial amendment of the definition of the term “accident” contained in LSA-R.S.
-
Lee v. Southern Maid Paper Co.
203 So. 2d 431
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
406 ; Harris v. Southern Carbon Co., (La.App., 2 Cir., 1935), ; York v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., (La.App., 1 Cir., 1948), .
-
Hargrave v. Travelers Insurance Co.
187 So. 2d 8
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Esteemed counsel for appellant cites and relies upon York v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., La.App., , and Harris v. Southern Carbon Co., La.App., .
-
Comoletti v. Ideal Cement Company
147 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
"In Harris v. Southern Carbon Co., Inc., La.App., , the disability resulted from a cancerous condition or growth on one of the legs of plaintiff.
- Circello v. Haas & Haynie Corp. 116 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
-
Valentine v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.
90 So. 2d 442
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1956
* * * ” In Glover v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., La.App., , the disability resulted from the fact that at a particular time “plaintiff * * * got a lot of the dust in his eye and that he rubbed his eye, which aggravated the pain.” In Harris v. Southern Carbon Co., Inc., La.App., , the disability resulted from a cancerous condition or growth on one of the legs of plaintiff.
-
Stokes v. Miller
50 So. 2d 509
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
As to the second error assigned, the case of Harris v. Southern Carbon Co., La.App., , upon which the District Court relied, defines an “occupational disease” as one “which is not only incident to, but natural, usual, and ordinary result of, employee’s occupation”.
-
Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc.
191 So. 326
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Harris v. Southern Carbon Company, La.App., 1935, .
-
Hibbard v. Blane
183 So. 39
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
we stated that an expert fee should be allowed to each expert witness who testified in the case.
-
Harris v. Southern Carbon Co.
181 So. 469
La. 1938
foot were amputated, the trouble or danger of further infection would be ended.” .
-
Harris v. Southern Carbon Co.
182 So. 370
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
*371 With reference to this, we stated in our original opinion ( ) that “all the doctors for both plaintiff and defendant testify that plaintiffs foot was in such condition as to render it totally useless, and that, due to the condition of his foot, he was disabled from performing any labor or to follow any trade” (page 433).