Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Veal, 242 So. 2d 551.

41 citing documents.

Succession of Stephen J. Dibeneditto La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Further, because the purpose of an attestation clause is merely to “evince the facts and circumstances of the confection and execution” of a will, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held the form of an attestation clause is not “sacrosanct.” Liner, 320 So.3d at 1137, (1970); (1973).
Succession Of James Conway Liner, III (Parish of Ouachita) Original D Ecree Vac Ated; C Ourt Of Ap … La. 2021
380, 385, (1970); -30 (1973).
Succession of Michelle Beth Roy Booth and Robert Mark Booth, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
380, -53 (1970), wherein the supreme court explained: There must be an attestation clause, or clause of declaration.
In re Watson 253 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In re Pelfrey 248 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
380 , , 552 (1970) ; Succession of Dawson , supra at 425.
In re Rogers 243 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Successions of Toney 226 So. 3d 397 La. 2017
380, 385 , , 552-3 (1970) (citations omitted).
In the Matter of the Succession of John Robert Biscamp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In re the Succession of Biscamp 211 So. 3d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Lott v. Mahalia Jackson Residual Family Corp. XYZ Shareholders & XYZ Directors 153 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Succession of Holbrook 144 So. 3d 845 La. 2014
Succession of Gladys Knott Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Succession of Hebert 101 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Re Succession of Carlton 34 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
380 , (1970), the court explained that statutory wills are not founded on the civilian law but rather on common law principles which have as their original source the English Statute of Frauds of 1677.
Succession of Donnie Dewayne Carlton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
380, 3 (1970), the court explained that statutory wills are not founded on the civilian law but rather on common law principles which have as their original source the English Statute of Frauds of 1677.
Succession of Siverd 24 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
380, 385 , (1970); (La.App.
In Re Succession of Richardson 934 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
380 , (1970), the court explained that statutory wills are not founded on the civilian law but rather on common law principles which have as their original source the English Statute of Frauds of 1677.
In Re Succession of Manuel 806 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
380 , (1970), for the proposition that "the validity of a will is to be maintained if possible."
Successions of Eddy 664 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Succession of Harvey 573 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Succession of Marcello 532 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
380 , , and courts ‘will not require strict, technical and pedantic compliance in form_’ It would sacrifice substance to form, and reasonableness to hypertechnicality, to reject a will on the basis that the testator or testatrix’s signature was not ‘at the end of the will’ because a space of an inch intervened between
Succession of Thibodeaux 527 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Succession of English 508 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Succession of Chabert v. Laborde 507 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Succession of Brown 458 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
380 , (1970); Succession of Thibodeaux, 238 La.
Succession of Norton 451 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Estate of Wartelle 428 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Succession of Dilley 422 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
380 , at 552 , the Supreme Court of Louisiana announced: "It may follow the form suggested in the statute or use a form substantially similar thereto.
Succession of Byrd 419 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Succession of Loeb 410 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
380 , (1971), to maintain a will if possible rather than require strict compliance in form, we conclude that this will substantially complies with the statutory requirements.
Evans v. Evans 410 So. 2d 729 La. 1982
Johnson v. Succession of Johnson 405 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Succession of Dugas 400 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
380 , , and courts "will not require strict, technical and pedantic compliance in form...."
Haase v. Robicheaux 400 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
380 , , and courts “will not require strict, technical and pedantic compliance in form ....
Succession of Bel 377 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
380 , ; Succession of Zinsel, La.App., .
Rittiner v. Sinclair 374 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Succession of Melancon 330 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Succession of Porche 288 So. 2d 27 La. 1973
380 , (1971); Comment, 28 Tul.L.Rev.
Succession of Porche 273 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1973
380 , (1970) has declared that the will provided in R.S.
Estate of Moreau v. Moreau 261 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
McCullough v. Bridges 245 So. 2d 319 La. 1971