State v. Ward
State v. Ward, 249 So. 2d 921 (La. 1971).
Cited by
- St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. GAF Corp. 512 So. 2d 1165 La. 1987
- Pierce v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ETC. 392 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Hickman v. Fletcher 317 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Lloyd v. Lloyd 313 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
- Ardoin v. Ardoin 306 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- State v. Petition for Judicial Commitment of Fletcher 289 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- State Ex Rel. Preston v. Henderson 283 So. 2d 230 La. 1973
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Ward 246 La. 766
- State v. Cox 167 So. 2d 359
- Spinato v. Lowe 239 La. 604
- State v. Melerine 238 La. 847
Opinion text
TATE, Justice. This appeal is from the trial court’s denial of a motion to re-sentence the defendant to life imprisonment. The defendant had previously been sentenced to death. See 246 La. 766 , 167 So.2d 359 (1964). Such sentence was set *319 aside on collateral review, for reasons not here pertinent. By a plea of moctness, our attention is called to the circumstance that, following the trial court denial of the motion, the defendant’s death sentence was commuted to a term of ten years and six months. The plea is well founded. The courts will not rule on questions of law which become moot, since their decree will serve no useful purpose and can give no practical relief. Spinato v. Lowe, 239 La. 604 , 119 So.2d 480 (1960); State v. Melerine, 238 La. 847 , 116 S.2d 689 (1960). The defendant has already received by executive clemency the relief sought by these proceedings; therefore, the question presented is moot. For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed.