State ex rel. Goins v. Henderson
State ex rel. Goins v. Henderson, 242 So. 2d 889 (La. 1971).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State ex rel. Toups v. Henderson 257 La. 448
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Henderson 242 So. 2d 575
Opinion text
BARHAM, J., concurs. Applicant has failed to attach the evidence presented in the trial court at his hearing to this application. He has not asked for or been denied a transcript of that evidence. Since he does not desire a review of the evidence, he apparently relies upon the trial judge’s reasons for denial of the writ as a correct finding of fact. A review of those reasons establishes a negation of relator’s allegations. Therefore the showing made does not warrant the relief sought. See concurrence in State ex rel. Toups v. Henderson, 257 La. 448 , 242 So.2d 575 , on our docket.