Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rome v. S. D'Antoni, Inc., 247 So. 2d 864.

13 citing documents.

TRCM, LLC v. Twilight Partnership 706 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Whitney Nat. Bank v. FWF, INC. 635 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Brown v. Rudy Smith Service, Inc. 441 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Tuttle v. Tuttle 430 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Stovall v. Tom Hicks Transfer Co. 425 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1st Cir.), writ refused, (1971).
State, Div. of Admin. v. Algernon Blair, Inc. 415 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
766 , (1971), the court was confronted with a somewhat similar situation and contention.
George Engine Co., Inc. v. Southern Shipbldg. Corp. 350 So. 2d 881 La. 1977
766 , (1971) in support of its position.
National American Bank of New Orleans v. Hosen 323 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1975
765 , (1971), which permits an opposition to a claim for deficiency judgment based on the invalidity of the executory process proceeding.
Stone v. Stone 292 So. 2d 686 La. 1974
766 , (1971), has interpreted La.R.S.
Stockman v. Money, Inc. 277 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Neubauer v. Thiac 264 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Vittetoe v. Traders & General Insurance 255 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
767 , (1971) it was said that: “ * * * where the motorist on the favored street could have avoided the accident by the exercise of the slightest degree of observation and care, he will be deemed guilty of negligence consti *834 tuting a proximate cause of the accident.” [ ] We interpret the above statemen
Clark v. Sears, Roebuck and Company 254 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by