No. 51461
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Easom v. Henderson
State ex rel. Easom v. Henderson, 248 So. 2d 334 (La. 1971).
Cited by
- Doc's Clinic, APMC v. DHH 984 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Bally's Louisiana, Inc. v. GAMING CONTROL BD. 807 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Victorian v. Stalder 770 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Save Our Selves v. LA. ENVIR. CONTROL COM'N 430 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Powell v. Tac Amusement Co. 424 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Christopher Estates, Inc. v. PARISH, ETC. 413 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter 383 So. 2d 330 La. 1980
- Cheatum v. Wackenhut Corp. 346 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- FIRST FED. S. & L. ASS'N OF CONCORDIA VIDALIA v. Smith 327 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Concordia Vidalia v. Smith 327 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Opinion text
In re: John Easom applying for writ of habeas corpus. Application denied. Showing made does not justify the exercise of our jurisdiction. BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that an evidentiary hearing should be ordered. If any of the five (5) guilty pleas have-been the subject of hearings on post conviction applications in the lower court, we should order a record of that evidence to be forwarded. On the face of the record before us accused did not have counsel or waive counsel on the plea in 1958 or on the four pleas in 1962.