51569 Precedential Processed

Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 1, 1972 · 262 So. 2d 328

Also decided on this docket: La., September 23, 1971 252 So. 2d 448

Cited by

Kevin Cope and Roger Laine v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Kitty Dunn v. Regional Transit Authority La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AC1, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Drema Cambre and Sandtrell Broden Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. William Serigne, Sr. and Lionel Serigne, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Joseph "Ted" Davisson Versus Board of Examiners for New Orleans and Baton Rouge Steamship … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Toni Lathon v. Leslie Lakes Retirement Center and TDC Specialty Underwriters La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Albert W. Block, Jr. and Claudia Ann Marlette Block v. Capital One, N.A. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Neighbors of 200 Henry Clay Avenue and Audubon Riverside Neighborhood Association v. the Board … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Matthew Lacas v. Monroe Credit, LLC, Willys Gerald, Patrick Herring, and Richard W. Huye, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
J. Benjamin Zapata And Amanda Zapata v. Stephen Wayne La. 2021
Federal Work Ready, Inc. v. Barry Wright and Millicent Wright La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020

Opinion text

DIXON, Justice (concurring). I fully concur, except that I would not suggest that Arnold had more than six months (C.C. 191) from the date he testified to bring an action en desaveu. If he did not at that time actually know of the birth of the child, the circumstances were such that he should have been placed on notice, and should have known.