State ex rel. Fournette v. Henderson
State ex rel. Fournette v. Henderson, 258 So. 2d 552 (La. 1972).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson 260 La. 1196
- Hooter v. Wilson 258 So. 2d 550
- State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson 259 So. 2d 557
Opinion text
In re: George Fournette applying for remedial writs and habeas corpus. Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought. BARHAM, J., does not concur. See State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson dissent, 260 La. 1196 , 258 So.2d 550 , and dissent in State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La. -, 259 So.2d 557 . TATE, J., concurs in denial. See State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La. -, 259 So.2d 557 . (1972). *1203 DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal to grant. This is a post-Boykin case. The record shows no compliance with the Boy-kin case. La. courts should correct their own mistakes, instead of referring the cases to the Federal system.