DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lorio v. Kaizer, 277 So. 2d 633.

22 citing documents.

  • Brandao v. McMahon 857 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    *4 1980); , 638 (La.1973).
  • Perrin v. Kuehne 704 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • Amend v. McCabe 664 So. 2d 1183 La. 1995
  • Brouillette v. Ducote 634 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Doell v. Lachney 544 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • Dodd v. Tucker 528 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Castjohn v. Hepplewhite Homes, Inc. 501 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    our Supreme Court interpreted these codal articles as applied to real estate: A summation of the theory of the law is that the vendee seeks a reduction in *869 the purchase price in the amount expended to repair the defect or vice in the realty purchased because that defect or vice diminished the value to s
  • Sanders v. Sanders Tractor Co., Inc. 480 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Ingraffia v. Coleman 467 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    our Supreme Court, citing their prior decision of Pursell v. Kelly, 244 La.
  • Foret v. Kennedy 459 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to a in which the court stated the rule that the measure of recovery in an action in quanti minoris involving a building is the amount necessary to convert the unsound structure into a sound one.
  • Hebert v. Broussard 450 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Barker v. Tangi Exterminating Co. 448 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Pursell v. Kelly, 244 La.
  • Rice v. Lee 442 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Voorhies v. Livingston 420 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    " the Supreme Court reaffirmed the reasonable man standard but explained that while an inspection connotes more than a casual observation the buyer need not inspect with expertise or `deface' *1209 the thing purchased while inspecting it."
  • Estopinal v. Bourshie 420 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Dansky v. Thompson 415 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Pursell v. Kelly, 244 La.
  • Broussard v. Breaux 412 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Prat v. Heymann 410 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Verlander v. Hoffer 351 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    142 , (1952); McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co., Inc., 220 La.
  • State v. Delpit 341 So. 2d 876 La. 1977
  • State v. George 339 So. 2d 762 La. 1976
  • Maguire v. Masino 325 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Fraser v. Ameling, La., (1973).