No. 52392
Precedential
Processed
Cormack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Cormack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 261 So. 2d 230 (La. 1972).
Cited by
- Guillory v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. 520 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Pinelli 466 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Armstrong v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc. 463 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- Fruge v. First Continental Life & Acc. Ins. 430 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Richard v. Board of Trustees 411 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Frank v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc. 407 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Matherne v. Prudential Ins. Co. 362 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Fontenot v. New York Life Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Hill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stine 341 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Parker v. State 282 So. 2d 483 La. 1973
Opinion text
*826 We find no error of law in the Court of Appeal judgment. DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the writ should issue. The policy provision as interpreted by the court of appeal gives a benefit for dental treatment that is largely illusory.