Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Henderson, 261 So. 2d 230.
-
Michael P. Tyler v. Joseph Dejean
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
825, (1972) (finding summary judgment evidence presented no factual contradictions “only conflicting conclusions based on those facts”).
-
Tyler v. Dejean
121 So. 3d 204
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
825 , (1972) (finding summary judgment evidence presented no factual contradictions “only conflicting conclusions based on those facts”).
-
Dufrene v. Willingham
656 So. 2d 1063
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
825 , (1972) (finding summary judgment evidence presented no factual contradictions “only conflicting conclusions based on those facts”).
-
Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP.
639 So. 2d 730
La. 1994
825 , (1972) (finding summary judgment evidence presented no factual contradictions "only conflicting conclusions based on those facts").
-
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.
639 So. 2d 730
La. 1994
825 , (1972) (finding summary judgment evidence presented no factual contradictions “only conflicting conclusions based on those facts”).
- Rankins v. Aytch 591 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Hopper v. Crown 555 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Friar v. Caterpillar, Inc. 529 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-
Guillory v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.
520 So. 2d 1071
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
824 , the court interpreted a health and accident policy which covered dental services only if they were “rendered” within six months after the accident.
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Pinelli 466 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Armstrong v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc.
463 So. 2d 1331
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
824 , [health and accident policy].
- Fruge v. First Continental Life & Acc. Ins. 430 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
-
Richard v. Board of Trustees
411 So. 2d 491
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
824 , .” *493 The law of this case, the insurance contract between the parties, is found in a brochure entitled “State of Louisiana Employees Uniform Group Benefits Program”, which was introduced as “joint exhibit 1”.
-
Frank v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc.
407 So. 2d 10
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
824 , .” In holding that the 48 hour requirement in the policy before the court is unreasonable and against public policy the trial judge stated: “To hold otherwise would compel an insured under such a policy to become hospitalized within forty-eight (48) hours after an accident whether or not during that time he would need
-
Hamilton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
364 So. 2d 215
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
825 , ) in which the issue as to an alleged employer's vicarious liability was disposed of on motion for summary judgment.
- Badeaux v. East Jefferson Gen. Hospital 364 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- Matherne v. Prudential Ins. Co. 362 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Fontenot v. New York Life Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Hill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- Scoggins v. Smith 342 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stine 341 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Parker v. State 282 So. 2d 483 La. 1973