DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Elledge v. Warren, 266 So. 2d 223.

31 citing documents.

  • Chesser v. Royal & Sunalliance Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    3rd Cir.), writ denied, , (1972) ("[t]here is no requirement in the statute that the insured have any relation, at the time of the accident, with any vehicle he owns and that is insured with the insurer") (emphasis added); (La.App.
  • Hobbs v. Rhodes 667 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    3rd Cir.1972), writ refused , (1972), the court held: The uninsured motorists protection covers the insured ...
  • Sanner v. Zurich-American Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    3d Cir.), writ denied, , (1972) (`[t]here is no requirement in the statute that the insured have any relation, at the time of the accident, with any vehicle he owns and that is insured with the insurer') (emphasis added); (La.App.
  • Frois v. Bullock 639 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    3rd Cir.), writ refused, , (1972), an insured is covered by the UM statute whether he's walking, driving, or rocking on the front porch.
  • Sandoz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 620 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3rd Cir.1972), writ denied, , (1972).
  • Higbee v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    3rd Cir.), writ ref'd , (1972) to argue that the public policy underlying R.S.
  • Fortier v. Hamblin 610 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Howell v. Balboa Ins. Co. 564 So. 2d 298 La. 1990
    3d Cir.), writ denied, , (1972) ("[t]here is no requirement in the statute that the insured have any relation, at the time of the accident, with any vehicle he owns and that is insured with the insurer") (emphasis added); (La.App.
  • McDaniel v. DeJean 556 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    3rd Cir.1972), writ refused, , (1972); (La.App.
  • Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    3rd Cir.), writ refused, , (1972), appears the following: There existed in our society a situation whereby financially irresponsible people could acquire and drive vehicles capable of great damage.
  • Bauer v. White 532 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    3d Cir.), writ denied, , (1972).
  • Vincent v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 526 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    3 Cir. 1972), writ refused, , .
  • Fisher v. Morrison 519 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Hastings v. International Service Ins. Co. 490 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    3d Cir.1972), writ den., , (1972).
  • Solice v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 488 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    3d Cir.1972), writ den., , (1972).
  • Glass Services Unlimited v. Modular Quarters, Inc. 478 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    3rd Cir.1972), writ refused, , (1972).
  • Smith v. Royal Globe Insurance 424 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    3rd Cir.1972), writ refused, , (La.App.
  • Oncale v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 417 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Hebert v. Breaux 398 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    3 Cir. 1972), writ refused, , .
  • Branch v. O'BRIEN 396 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    3d Cir. 1972), writ refused , (1972).
  • Schmidt v. Estate of Choron 376 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    3rd Cir. 1972), writ denied, , (La.App.
  • Hickerson v. Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha 375 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    3rd Cir. 1972), writ refused , , the court stated that the uninsured motorist statute must be liberally construed to carry out the objective of providing compensation for those injured through no fault of their own.
  • Robertson v. Cumis Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    App. 3 Cir. 1972), writ refused because the judgment was not final, , we rejected the result of Rushing cited hereinabove with respect to uninsured motorist coverage in instances where an insured is occupying an uninsured automobile owned by the named insured.
  • Posey v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 332 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    2d 155 (La.App.3d Cir. 1973); writ refused , ; writ refused La., ; writ refused La., (1975); (La
  • Nolker v. Wallace 317 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    3rd Cir. 1972), writ refused , (1972); Thibodeaux v. St.
  • Hebert v. Green 311 So. 2d 223 La. 1975
    writs refused ("the judgment is not final") , (1972).
  • Gremillion v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 302 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    3 Cir. 1972), writ refused , .
  • Doucet v. Insurance Company of North America 302 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    3 Cir. 1972) writ refused , ; Crenwelge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Chateau v. Smith 297 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    622 , , a motorcycle is equally an "automobile" for purposes of exclusion, citing part of the majority reasoning in Elledge v. Warren, La.App.1972, , writ refused, , .
  • Crenwelge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 277 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    *159 writ refused , for the reason "The judgment is not final".
  • Elledge v. Warren 266 So. 2d 223 La. 1972
    (1972) Mary A. ELLEDGE, individually and in her capacity as natural tutrix of the minor, Murray Jay Elledge v. Earl F. WARREN et al. No. 52655.