Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., 169 So. 147.

17 citing documents.

Wise v. Prescott 142 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
*619 The court in Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., , observed that a sign marked "Cross Roads" should have impressed a motorist that not far ahead was an intersection and his vigilance should have been quickened thereby to meet any contingency that might arise.
May v. Huey 116 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Sullivan v. Locke, La.App., -621 ; Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., ; Holderith v. Zilbermann, La.App., 151 So.
Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 114 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., .
Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance 111 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
670 ; Sullivan v. Locke, La.App., , This court, in Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., , very appropriately stated: “The superior privilege of right of way does not confer license to disregard fundamental rules instituted for the protection and safety of persons motoring on public highways.
Platt v. Scarborough 108 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., ; Rottman v. Beverly, 183 La.
Montalbano v. Hall 108 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., ; Commercial Credit Corp. v. Morris, La.App., .
Commercial Credit Corporation v. Morris 107 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., .
Womack v. Travelers Insurance Co. 106 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Scott v. Richard, La.App., ; Culver v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., ; Bagley v. Standard Coffee Co., La.App., 168 So.
Youngblood v. Allstate Insurance Co. 98 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
This court has also stated in Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., , 152: “The superior privilege of right of way does not confer license to disregard fundamental rules instituted for the protection and safety of persons motoring on public highways.
Keith v. Royal Indemnity Company 90 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
152: "The superior privilege of right of way does not confer license to disregard fundamental rules instituted for the protection and safety of persons motoring on public highways.
Martin v. Adams 88 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., .
Hickerson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 77 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Scott v. Richard, La.App., ; Culver v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., ; Bagley v. Standard Coffee Co., La.App., 168 So.
Bush v. Williams 74 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
App., 1949, ; Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., 1936, ; Iglesias v; Campbell, La.App., 1936, 170 So.
Sullivan v. Locke 73 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
152: "The superior privilege of right of way does not confer license to disregard fundamental rules instituted for the protection and safety of persons motoring on public highways.
Wilson v. Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport 64 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
App., ; Bagley v. Standard Coffee Co., La.App., 168 So.
Barr v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 188 So. 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
See Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App., ; and cases therein cited.
Long v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York 169 So. 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
this day decided by us. The effect of defendant’s effort to cancel the policy presents a more difficult question for determination.