DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Iglesias v. Campbell, 175 So. 145.

28 citing documents.

  • Reeves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 149 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    2d Cir., 1937, (writs denied).
  • Scurria v. Russo 134 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    905 ; Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., ; Central Sav.
  • Holt v. All State Insurance 131 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Plaintiff cites Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., , and Howard v. Great American Indemnity Company, La.App., as authority for the proposition that a motorist must use due care under the circumstances and that his conduct in this regard is gauged by the speed which he was traveling, the control which he maintained over his automobile and the alertness of
  • Gallioto v. Chisholm 126 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    See Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., .
  • Fontenot v. LaFleur 124 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
  • Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Caldwell 111 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
  • Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 96 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    121 ; Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., ; Jamison v. State, La.App., ; Brown v. Wade, La.App., 145 So.
  • Sonnier v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 79 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    See Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., 1937, .
  • Bush v. Williams 74 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    265 , reinstated on rehearing, La.App., ; Butler v. Mississippi Foundation Co., La.App., 1937, 175 So.
  • Lee v. Kastner 69 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    See Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., .
  • Columbia Fire Ins. v. Black 61 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    International Paper Company v. Arkansas & Louisiana-Missouri Ry.
  • Breaux v. Barichnivich 49 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    The mere fact that the driver of the car in this case did not see plaintiff does not absolve the defendant from liability, because it was the duty of.the driver to look, and, according to the findings of both courts, he was not looking.” See also Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., ; Maher v. New Orleans Linen Supply Company, La.App., ; and Young v. Creegan, La.App., .
  • Cox v. Gross 47 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    In Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., (13, 14) it was stated: “It is an inexorable rule of law that the operator of an automobile is held to see that which he should have seen and which, of course, may be seen and observed by human eyesight; and this being true, we can see no sound reason for holding that the operator must actually see the injured pe
  • Toussaint v. American Mut. Liability Ins. 46 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    515 ; Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., ; Wessell Plumbing Co. v. Norton, 3 La.App.
  • O'Connor v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. 40 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Russo v. Texas Pacific Ry.
  • International Paper v. Arkansas Louisiana M.R. Co. 35 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Daw v. Matthews 34 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , that when the facts warranted application of the principle a court had the right, on its own motion, to do so.
  • Howze v. Hollandsworth 26 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App. Second Circuit, , is another case in which the doctrine of the last clear chance was applied, citing the Rottman case.
  • Law v. Osterland 3 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    265 , and Id., La.App., , and of the Supreme Court in Jackson v. Cook, 189 La.
  • Boullion v. Bonin 2 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., .
  • Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. 198 So. 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    81 ; Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., ; Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., 175 So.
  • Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 192 So. 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    App., ; Russo v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
  • Boissac v. Kleinpeter 191 So. 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., .
  • Young v. Thompson 189 So. 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
  • Prince v. Texas & N. O. R. Co. 189 So. 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    169 ; Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., ; Jackson v. Cook, 189.
  • Jackson v. Cook 181 So. 195 La. 1938
  • Russo v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 177 So. 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    by the decision of the Court of Appeal for the Second circuit, a motorist must be held to have seen what he should have seen, and consequently it is not necessary that he actually see the injured person for the last clear chance doctrine to apply.
  • Jackson v. Cook 176 So. 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937