No. 53683
Precedential
Processed
Watson v. Tippen
Watson v. Tippen, 279 So. 2d 697 (La. 1973).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Watson v. Tippen 277 So. 2d 700
- Amyx v. Henry & Hall 227 La. 364
- Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co. 262 La. 102
Opinion text
In re: Harold E. Watson, individually and as administrator of the estates of his minor sons, Barry and Scott Watson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 277 So.2d 700 . Application denied. The judgment is correct. TATE, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted since the rationale is inconsistent with those in Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 227 La. 364 , 79 So.2d 483 (1955) and Hickman v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 262 La. 102 , 262 So.2d 385 (1972).