Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roby Motors Co. v. Price, 173 So. 793.
- William E. Trotter, II v. Charles M. Fife, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C. and Charles M. Fife, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Trotter v. Charles M. Fife, Jr. & Associates, LLC 36 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Alfred Palma, Inc. v. Crane Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Alfred Palma, Inc. v. Crane Services, Inc. 858 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Shelton v. Standard/700 Associates 798 So. 2d 60 La. 2001
-
Fusilier v. Ardoin
266 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
He cites cases involving redhibition, (La.App.
- Foy v. Ed Taussig, Inc. 220 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
- California Chemical Company v. Lovett 204 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
-
Abraham v. Dalworth Machinery Co.
167 So. 2d 185
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Roby Motors Co. v. Price, La.App., ; Sidney Machine Tool Company v. Blanchard, 186 La.
-
Breeden v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
140 So. 2d 680
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
982 , ; Roby Motors Co. v. Price, La.App., ; Kuhlmann v. Purpera, La.App., ; Dougherty v. Petrere, 240 La.
-
Meyer v. MacK Motor Trucks, Inc.
141 So. 2d 427
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
App., ; Kuhlman v. Purpera, La.App., ; Dougherty v. Petrere, 240 La.
-
Kelly v. Galilee Baptist Church
106 So. 2d 733
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
If the vice has made its appearance within three days immediately following the sale, it is presumed to have existed before the sale.” Defendants, assuming the roll of plaintiff in-reconvention, and seeking to rescind the *735 sale by virtue of redhibitory vices and defects in the bus, cite Roby Motors Company v. Price, La.App., .
-
American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.
23 So. 2d 409
La. 1944
20; Roby Motors Co. v. Price, La.App., ; Markey v. Hibernia Homestead Ass’n, La.App., 186 So.