No. 5441.
Precedential
Processed
Hall v. Hall
Hall v. Hall, 179 So. 877 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937).
Cited by
- Parks v. Hall 182 So. 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Parks v. Hall 181 So. 191 La. 1938
- Parks v. Hall 179 So. 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Opinion text
DREW, Judge (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case for the reason that I am of the opinion that the omnibus clause in the insurance policy covers the case and makes the insurance company liable thereunder. In my opinion the driver of the *878 car causing the damage was lawfully in possession of same at the time of the accident.