DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co., 175 So. 86.

25 citing documents.

  • Landry v. Travelers Indemnity Company 155 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Co., La.App., ; Mire v. Lafourche Parish School Board, La., .
  • Willis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 152 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    We cite only a few of the almost innumerable authorities in which these principles have been iterated: Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company (La.App.2d Circuit, 1937, writs denied), ; Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines (La.App.2d Circuit, 1945, writs denied), ; Green v. Baton Rouge Bus Company (La.App.
  • Woods v. Hinton 116 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    272 ; Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Co., La.App., ; Hart v. Gulf, Mobile & Northern R. Co., La.App., 167 So.
  • Johnson v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 113 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Co., La.App., ; Hughes v. Baton Rouge Electric Co., La.App., 188 So.
  • Coleman v. Continental Southern Lines 107 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App.1937, ; Grant v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, Inc., La.App.1943, ; Hopper v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App.1951, ; Chisholm v. Ryder, La.App.1952, ; Coleman v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.
  • Deason v. Greyhound Corporation 106 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    1362 ]; Wallace v. Shreveport Railway Co., La.App., ; and Baptiste v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., 161 So.
  • Llorens v. City of Alexandria 106 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    The facts of the instant case are remarkably similar to the facts in Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., .
  • Tomasik v. Shreveport Railways Co. 98 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Co., La.App., ; Dickson v. Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport, Inc., La.App., ; Harris v. Shreveport Railways Co., La.App., ; Peters v. City of Monroe, La.App., .
  • Coleman v. Shreveport Railways Company 86 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. McHenery 69 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    "The following quotation is taken from Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Co., [La.App.,] : `Although it has sometime been stated that the burden of proof will shift to defendant on plaintiff making out a prima facie case, this statement is inaccurate, and, where defendant sets up a plea or answer denying its liability, the main burden of proof does not shift, but is on plaintiff throughout the case, even
  • Young v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 68 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
    Co., La.App., , cited by counsel for plaintiffs, we quote briefly from the decision of our Brothers of the Second Circuit in that case.
  • Mire v. Lafourche Parish School Board 62 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    272 ; Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Co., La.App., ; Hart v. Gulf, Mobile & Northern R. Co., La.App., 167 So.
  • Chisholm v. Ryder 56 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    See Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., .
  • Restelle v. Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York 41 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Grant v. Baton Rouge Bus Co., La.
  • Brooks v. Airline Motor Coaches 35 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • McFarland v. City of Monroe 11 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., .
  • Valdry v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 5 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Co. La.App., ; Thomas v. Shreveport Rys.
  • Anderson v. City of Monroe 2 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    376 , and Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., .
  • Lee v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 200 So. 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    The case of Wallace against the present defendant, decided by this court and reported in , is especially relied upon.
  • Miller v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 196 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    In Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., , the plaintiff was a woman 54 years old who weighed 254 pounds, and, though it is true that recovery was allowed, it was based on the fact that defendant company had not been able to-overcome plaintiff’s proof that the car had been started with a sudden and unusual jolt and not on the fact that, because of her weight
  • Latoof v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. 195 So. 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    Plaintiff strongly relies upon Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., , in which this court held, inter alia: “A prima facie case of negligence against street railroad was established by passenger’s showing that she paid her fare and was injured while on car.
  • Fernandez v. Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. 194 So. 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    376 , and Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Co., La.App., .
  • Owens v. Monzingo 191 So. 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1939
  • Thomas v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 187 So. 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., , and cases therein cited.
  • Dunaway v. Maroun 178 So. 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    See Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., ; the Supreme Court denied a writ in this case.