No. 54519
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Harvey v. Baudoin
State ex rel. Harvey v. Baudoin, 292 So. 2d 245 (La. 1974).
Opinion text
BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The trial court has denied defendant-relator a preliminary examination under his “discretion” which actually is a simple finding that a bill of information has been filed. If “discretion” is the standard for granting a preliminary examination, it is abused here. However, “discretion” may not be the standard. See Pugh v. Rainwater, 5 Cir. 1973, 483 F.2d 778 . TATE, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.