Burchik v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co.
Burchik v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co., 177 So. 484 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937).
Cited by
- Finley v. Police Jury of Catahoula Parish 180 So. 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1938
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Grabenheimer & Sons, Inc. v. Henderson 174 So. 209
Opinion text
HAMITER, Judge. The appeal in this case is from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action filed by defendant. In his petition, plaintiff alleges that he received injuries while riding on a freight train owned and negligently operated by defendant company, and prays damages therefor. • It is obvious that appellant has abandoned the appeal, for he has made no appearance in its behalf, either through oral argument or brief. In a situation of this kind, the judgment appealed from will not be disturbed. Calhoun v. Hodges (La. App.) 174 So. 209 , and cases therein cited. The judgment is affirmed.