Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alleman v. Seventh Ward General Hospital, 296 So. 2d 837.

17 citing documents.

Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 10 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Louis' Florist Shop of Lake Charles, Inc. v. United Fire & Cas. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1 Cir.), writ refused, 3 ).
Louis' Florist Shop of Lake Charles, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 887 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir.), mit refused, ).
McGee v. Omni Ins. Co. 840 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Gourley v. Prudential Property Ins. 734 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
App. 1st Cir.1973), writ denied, A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's finding of fact in the absence of manifest error.
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Dixie Ins. Co. 622 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Rogers v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1974), writ refused, : *673 "...
Keith v. Comco Insurance Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
1st Cir.), writ denied (1974).
Keith v. Comco Ins. Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
1st Cir.), writ denied (1974).
Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 557 So. 2d 966 La. 1990
1st Cir.) writ refused, Younger v. Lumbermen's Mut.
SOUTHERN AMERICAN INS. CO. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 498 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.), writ refused, (emphasis added).
Hodge v. American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. 486 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Quintana Petroleum Corp. v. Alpha Investments Corp. 435 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1st Cir.1974), application denied
Hodges v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 411 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1 Cir. 1974), writ refused, see also Comment, Duty of Insurer to Settle, 30 La.L.Rev.
Lambert v. Maryland Cas. Co. 403 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Co., writ refused, Younger v. Lumbermens Mut.
Domangue v. Henry 394 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1 Cir. 1974), writ refused, considered the following factors in determining whether the insurer acted in good faith when refusing to settle: "(1) The probability of the insured's liability; (2) the adequacy of the insurer's investigation of the claim; (3) the extent of damages recoverable in excess of policy coverage; (4) rejection of
Moskau v. Insurance Co. of North America 366 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1974) writ refused considered the following factors in determining whether the insurer acted in "good faith" when refusing to settle, to wit: "(1) The probability of the insured's liability; (2) the adequacy of the insurer's investigation of the claim; (3) the extent of damages recoverable in excess of policy coverage; (4) re