McGee v. Board of Supervisors of Elections
Also decided on this docket: La., May 15, 1875 27 La. 413; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., March 8, 1974 291 So. 2d 520; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 14, 1962 139 So. 2d 242; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 4, 1912 9 Teiss. 182
McGee v. Board of Supervisors of Elections, 330 So. 2d 391 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976).
Cited by
- McGee v. Fuselier 330 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- McGee v. Fuselier 330 So. 2d 383
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. This is an election contest instituted under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420. That statute provides that when an appeal is taken in such a case the appellate court will decide the issue within 24 hours after submission. LSA-R.S. 18:420E. After considering the facts, the law and the arguments of counsel, we have concluded that there is rio error in the judgment rendered by the trial court. In view of the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420E, we have decided to render judgment at this time affirming the judgment appealed from. Reasons for that judgment will be assigned at a later date. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to defendant, Conrad Fuselier. *392 HOOD, Judge. For the reasons which we are assigning today in Roger Dale McGee v. Conrad Fuselier et al., 330 So.2d 383 (No. 5506 on our docket), we hereby confirm the judgment which we rendered in the instant suit on April 7, 1976. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant, Conrad Fuselier. AFFIRMED. DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs m the decree. WATSON, J., concurs in the result.