Fuselier v. McGee
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 3, 1973 278 So. 2d 164; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 9, 1962 140 So. 2d 497
Fuselier v. McGee, 330 So. 2d 392 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976).
Cited by
- McGee v. Fuselier 331 So. 2d 492 La. 1976
- McGee v. Fuselier 330 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- McGee v. Fuselier 330 So. 2d 383
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. This is an election contest instituted un der the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420. That statute provides that when an appeal is taken in such a case the appellate court will decide the issue within 24 hours after submission. LSA-R.S. 18:420E. After considering the facts, the law and the arguments of counsel, we have concluded that there is no error in the judgment rendered by the trial court. In view of the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420E, we have decided to render judgment at this time affirming the judgment appealed from. Reasons for that judgment will be assigned at a later date. The judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff, Conrad Fuselier. Appeal from the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Evangeline, State of Louisiana; Honorable J. Burton Foret, District Judge, Presiding. Before HOOD, CULPEPPER, DO-MENGEAUX, WATSON and GUIDRY, Judges. HOOD, Judge. For the reasons which we are assigning today in Roger Dale McGee v. Conrad Fuselier et al., 330 So.2d 383 (No. 5506 on our docket), we hereby affirm the judgment which we rendered in the instant suit on April 7, 1976. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff, Conrad Fuselier. AFFIRMED. DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs in the decree. WATSON, J., concurs in the result.