Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mecom v. Mobil Oil Corp., 302 So. 2d 308.

63 citing documents.

  • Whitney v. Mallet 442 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Urban Management Corp. v. Burns 427 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    3d Cir.1974); writ denied, (La.
  • Corley v. Gene Allen Air Service, Inc. 425 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    3rd Cir.1974), writ refused
  • Riviere v. Bethard 422 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    App. 3rd Cir.1974), writs ref'd
  • Verrett v. Cameron Telephone Co. 417 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Labit v. Welch 375 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    3rd Cir. 1974), application denied Employers’ Surplus Line Insurance Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra.
  • Bullock v. Louisiana Industries 370 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    2 Cir. 1974), writ refused, where a timber lease provision (alleged to be potestative) provided that if the lessee failed to pay the annual taxes on all or any part of the land involved, that portion of the land on which taxes were not paid would be released from the lease agreement.
  • Morris v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd. 354 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Seaton v. Kelly 327 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    3 Cir. 1974), writ granted to Wilkinson at , writ denied to Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company at , writ denied to Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company at , writ dismissed on joint motion at , this Court made it clear that, if the insurer of an automobile in which plaintiff’s deceased son was a guest passenger had issued three separate policies rather than one family policy, there would be no question the coverage in all three policies could be stacked.
  • Lee Lumber Co., Ltd. v. International Paper Co. 321 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    2 Cir. 1974), writ refused La., .
  • Bourgeois v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 316 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    However, the application for writs on behalf of Fireman's Fund ( ) and Lumbermen's Mutual ( ) were denied with the statement: "No error of law."
  • Barbin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 315 So. 2d 754 La. 1975
    3d Cir. 1974), application for certiorari by insurers denied
  • Brister v. American Indemnity Company 313 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    However, the application for writs on behalf of Fireman's Fund ( ) and Lumbermen's Mutual ( ) were denied with the statements: "No error of law."