No. 5543 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Prattini v. Bennett

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed July 19, 1973 · 281 So. 2d 187

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 7, 1976 335 So. 2d 75; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., August 7, 1961 133 So. 2d 357; La., March 15, 1875 27 La. 252

The holding in the court’s own words

We conclude damages for frivolous appeal should not be awarded.

Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.

Cited by

Opinion text

REDMANN, Judge. Defendants by this appeal seek reduction of a personal injury award. Plaintiff by answer seeks damages for frivolous appeal. Plaintiff’s injury was a cervical strain. Asymptomatic disc-narrowing and arthritic changes pre-existed. Treatment included physical therapy thrice weekly for three months, traction thrice weekly for four months, and use of a special collar and pillow. Over four months after the accident a consulting neuro-surgeon still found muscle spasm. A year after the accident defendant’s orthopedist concluded plaintiff “suffers from a resolving strain” of cervical muscular and ligament structure (our emphasis). There was expert opinion that plaintiff’s residual disability still existed shortly before trial and that her recovery would remain incomplete. This evidence places the trial judge’s $10,000 award, if towards the higher limit, within his “much discretion”, C.C. art. 1934(3). Defense counsel ably points out evidence that would have supported a lower award, but we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Plaintiff’s claim of frivolous appeal makes an able argument against appellate review of facts. However, we find this case no more one-sided than many others, and La.Const. art. 7, § 29 does oblige us to review facts. We conclude damages for frivolous appeal should not be awarded. The judgment is affirmed.