Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 178 So. 654.
-
Thomas Sharbono v. Fire Safety Sales and Service
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Highway Comm’n, (La.App.
-
Sharbono v. FIRE SAFETY SALES AND SERVICE
883 So. 2d 1066
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Highway Comm'n, (La.App.
- Ewing v. Trend Drilling Co. 446 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
Clark v. Town of Mandeville
100 So. 2d 317
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Johnson v. Nobles, La.App., ; Lee v. Nobles, La.App., 178 So.
-
Delouche v. City of Monroe
84 So. 2d 259
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
683 ; Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Holmes v. Armour & Co., La.App., 190 So.
-
Stokes v. Miller
50 So. 2d 509
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
273 ; Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Crouchet v. George H. Leidenheimer Baking Co., La.App., 184 So.
-
Le Blanc v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co. of San Francisco
48 So. 2d 681
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
The court citing the above cases said in the case of Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., , 656: ‘It is thus to be seen that we are confronted with a deplorable and irreconcilable conflict in the testimony of members of the medical profession relative to an important issue in the case.
-
Hebert v. Fifteen Oil Co.
46 So. 2d 328
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
The court citing the above cases said in the case of Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., , 656: “It is thus to be seen that we are confronted with a deplorable and irreconcilable conflict in the testimony of members of the medical profession relative to an important issue in the case.
-
Dilley v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
36 So. 2d 59
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1948
App., ; Christy v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.
-
Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co.
32 So. 2d 500
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., ; Christy v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.
-
Custer v. Higgins Industries
24 So. 2d 511
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App., , the court said: "It is contended by defendant that plaintiff suffered no accident within the meaning and intendment of the compensation statute, Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended.
-
Thompson v. Leach McClain
11 So. 2d 109
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
719 ; Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Carlino v. United States F. G. Co., 196 La.
-
Horton v. Louisiana Veneer Co.
196 So. 363
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
However, let us look to the lay testimony, as was done in Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., , assuming arguendo that the testimony of the physicians is irreconcilably conflicting and lends but little assistance in deciding the controversy.
-
Strahan v. Kansas City Bridge Co.
191 So. 742
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
However, since plaintiff has not appealed or answered the appeal herein, these questions urged in his brief are not properly before us (see Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ), and the only question at issue on appeal is whether or not the lower court erred in finding from the evidence that the plaintiff was suffering from a total, temporary disability resulting from an accident occurring in the course of his employment by the defendant; and, since *744 this is a question of fact,
-
Ulmer v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
190 So. 175
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
weeks if plaintiff’s disability continues for that period, nor do we deem it relevant to decide the point as to whether or not the defendant will have the right to deduct from the compensation due plaintiff the total amount of wages paid him between the date of his injury and December 28, 1938, as the employers were permitted to-do in the cases of Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., and Becton v. Deas Paving Company, 3 La.App.
-
Franklin v. Glen Rose Gasoline Co.
187 So. 846
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Comm., La.App., ; Bearman v. Fuller Construction Co., La.
-
Whitton v. United Gas Public Service Co.
187 So. 806
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
720 ; Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
-
Hibbard v. Blane
183 So. 39
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
187 ; Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Comm., La.App., ; Schneider v. Travelers Ins.