State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson
State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson, 305 So. 2d 542 (La. 1975).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. MacK 243 La. 369
- State v. Hopper 253 La. 439
Opinion text
In re: Adam A. Mack, Jr. applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition and Habeas Corpus. Writ denied. See appeal: 243 La. 369 , 144 So.2d 363 (1962). The alleged trial error does not constitute, under the facts, a claim for post-conviction relief. See State v. Hopper, 253 La. 439 , 218 So.2d 551 (1969); Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969). BARHAM, J., dissents from denial of writ. DIXON, J., dissents; applicant has been denied right of cross examination.