Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re the Adoption of Morgan, 310 So. 2d 643.
-
Dauzat v. Thompson Const. Co., Inc.
839 So. 2d 319
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
1st Cir.1974), writ denied
-
Sperli v. Guiterrez
772 So. 2d 805
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
1 Cir.1974), writ denied, (La.
-
Paul v. Royal Insurance Co.
628 So. 2d 1174
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1974), writ denied, the First Circuit stated at page 916: “This article [Art. 2322] obviates the necessity of an injured party having to prove ‘fault’ upon the part of an ‘owner’ or those for whom said owner is answerable.
-
Bordelon v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE CO.
617 So. 2d 1337
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1974), writ refused "
-
Green v. Popeye's Inc.
619 So. 2d 69
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
1 Cir.1974), writ denied
-
Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA
613 So. 2d 214
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1974), writ denied
-
Evans v. Olinde
609 So. 2d 299
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
App. 1st Cir.1974), writ refused, (La.App.
- Herron v. Lincoln Property Co. 525 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-
Toten v. General Motors Corp.
479 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1974), writ refused (La.App.
-
Pique v. Saia
432 So. 2d 896
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
denied, (1975), this court interpreted and found applicable an identical policy exclusion.
-
Hudson v. Thompson
422 So. 2d 640
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
1st Cir. 1974), writ refused
-
Lindstrom v. Arnold
421 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
1st Cir.1974), writ refused (La.
-
Kling v. Collins
407 So. 2d 478
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1st Cir. 1974), writ denied, (La.
-
Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corp.
410 So. 2d 674
La. 1981
1st Cir. 1974), writ refused for the proposition that C.C.
-
Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corp.
385 So. 2d 341
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1st Cir. 1975), writ refused (La.
-
Lawrence v. Moore
362 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1975) writs refused, La., .
-
Blanco v. Travelers Insurance Co.
350 So. 2d 1252
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1 Cir. 1975, , writ refused La., , which theorized (quoting the trial judge) that the replacement of lost wages by sick leave (or vacation leave) was itself a loss, in that accumulated sick leave “is as valuable an asset as a policy of health insurance” (as is accumulated vacation leave).
-
Tandy v. Simoneaux
344 So. 2d 406
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1st Cir. 1974), writs denied