No. 5603 Precedential Processed

Muro v. Smith

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed February 6, 1974 · 290 So. 2d 343

Also decided on this docket: La., May 15, 1876 28 La. Ann. 673; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., September 29, 1976 337 So. 2d 909; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 29, 1962 144 So. 2d 196; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 10, 1912 9 Teiss. 339

Cited by

Johnson v. Rogers & Phillips, Inc. 753 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Baach v. Clark 442 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hoerner 426 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Eaves v. McLeod Bros. Contractors, Inc. 395 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Burns v. Salisbury 367 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Williams v. Timphony 320 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Schexnider v. Allstate Insurance Company 304 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Levron v. Dupre 307 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Shipman v. Tardo 304 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Laird v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 293 So. 2d 184 La. 1974

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Cusimano v. Smith 290 So. 2d 342

Opinion text

C. WILLIAM BRADLEY, Judge Pro Tem. For the reasons assigned in Ruby Cusi-mano, Wife of/and Jules J. Armant v. Os-way Smith et al., La.App., 290 So.2d 342 on the docket of this Court, decided this day, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.