Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Osborn v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 312 So. 2d 340.

18 citing documents.

Bridges v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 551 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Dill v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 522 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
3 Cir.1975); writ denied (La.
Cheramie v. Brunet 510 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
3d Cir. 1975), writ refused (La.
Turner v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 509 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1975) writ denied, (1975).” Thus, as can be determined by the Usry, supra, decision, there are three findings which must be made in order to determine whether the DOTD breached its duty to the public.
Bingham v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 503 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.1975), writ denied (La.
Donaldson v. Giovengo 484 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
3 Cir.1975), writ denied .
Vallery v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 480 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1975), writ refused, and described the duty owed to motorists by the DOTD as follows: *822 "The Department of Highways is not responsible for every accident which occurs on state highways.
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Continental Casualty Co. 476 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
3d Cir.1975), writ denied
Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
& G. v. State, Dept. of Highways, (3rd Cir.1975) writ denied (1975)."
Hurston v. Hurston 417 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
App. 4th Cir. 1975), writ denied
Siler v. Guillotte 410 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
3rd Cir. 1975), writ refused, our court set forth the duty owed by the Department of Highways to motorists traveling on Louisiana's roadways by stating: "The Department of Highways is not responsible for every accident which occurs on state highways.
Oliver v. Parish of Jefferson 408 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied (La.App.
Usry v. Louisiana Department of Highways 402 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
U. S. F & G Co. v. State, Dept. of Highways, (3rd Cir. 1975) writ denied (1975).
Beeson v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 400 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied Laborde v. Louisiana Dept. of Highways.
Fuller v. Scott 387 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
ws (1) that the hazardous condition complained of was patently or obviously dangerous to a reasonably careful and ordinarily prudent driver, and(2) that the department had notice, either actual or constructive, of the existence of the defect and failed within a reasonable time to correct it.” Doucet v. State of Louisiana, Department of Highways, writ refused, St.
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. State, Department of Highways 339 So. 2d 780 La. 1976
Doucet v. State, Department of Highways, writ refused writ refused
Norris v. State 337 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied (La.App.
Robins v. City of Baton Rouge 331 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
3rd Cir. 1975), writ refused, .