Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Theriot, 323 So. 2d 120.

118 citing documents.

Duthu v. ALLEMENTS'ROBERSON MACH. WORKS, INC. 393 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Lieber v. Rust 388 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Consolidated Sewerage District of the City of Kenner v. Guenther 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
CONSOLIDATED SEWERAGE DIST. ETC. v. Schulin 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Hunter v. OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES, ETC. 385 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Twillie v. HB Zachry Co. 380 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
the Louisiana Supreme Court defined "estoppel" or "estoppel in pais" as follows: "Equitable estoppel, or `estoppel in pais,' can be defined as the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is barred from asserting rights against another party justifiably relying on such conduct and who has chang
Louisiana Paving Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. 372 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, La., ."
Super v. Burke 367 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
City of Bossier City v. Usery 356 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
STATE ETC. v. National Advertising Co. 356 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Westenberger v. State, Department of Education, (La.App.
Abbeville Lumber Co. v. Richard 350 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Stelly v. Montgomery 347 So. 2d 1145 La. 1977
Everett v. Everett 345 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Stelly v. Montgomery 339 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
In Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, La., (1975) our Supreme Court held that LSA-R.S.
State v. Mitchell 337 So. 2d 1186 La. 1976
In addition, "equitable estoppel" is not favored in our law () and properly applies only to representations of fact.
Farrar v. Swedish Health Spa 337 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Canova v. St. Germain 335 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
*511 (1975), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “Equitable estoppel, or ‘estoppel in pais,’ can be defined as the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is barred from asserting rights against another party justifiably relying on such conduct and who has changed his position to his detriment as a result of
Westenberger v. State, Department of Education 333 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, La., .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by