No. 57120
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Bazile v. Henderson
State ex rel. Bazile v. Henderson, 323 So. 2d 140 (La. 1975).
The holding in the court’s own words
The contention that trial counsel was incompetent or ineffective we conclude does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction in light of our earlier appellate review.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Scott 307 So. 2d 291
Opinion text
In re: Ulyessus Bazile applying for writ of certiorari and habeas corpus. Writ denied. All but one of applicant’s complaints were found non-meritorious by *141 this court on appeal. See State v. Scott & Bazile, 307 So.2d 291 (La.1975). The contention that trial counsel was incompetent or ineffective we conclude does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction in light of our earlier appellate review.