Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Matthews, 324 So. 2d 822.

95 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Darius Tyrese Persley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. James D. Flemones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
(in-custody physical examination of accused by state physician for limited purpose of making objective findings as to his physical condition is not protected by the doctor-patient privilege); La.C.E.
State Of Louisiana v. Andre V. Griffin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jason Lee Lopez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
In support of this assignment of error, Defendant cites several cases, cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jorie Jakell Walker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Isame Henry Faciane A/K/A Isame Faciance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Luzzo 214 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jaymes Larmar Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Harris 157 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anton Chehardy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Chehardy 157 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-28 (La.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Chairs 106 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Louisiana State Board of Nursing v. Gautreaux 39 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
44:3 does not create a privilege exempting law enforcement records from production for court purposes { ).
State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. LAVIOLETTE 943 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
State v. Marullo 923 So. 2d 638 La. 2006
(in-custody physical examination of accused by state physician for limited |3purpose of making objective findings as to his physical condition is not protected by the doctor-patient privilege); La.C.E.
State v. Gray 891 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
See State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; cert.
State v. Gray 874 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Williams 804 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. George 768 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Harris 765 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
From our examination of the jurisprudence, cert.
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
see also State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 6 (La.2/29/2000), , 2000 La.
State v. Haddad 767 So. 2d 682 La. 2000
State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Haddad 733 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Bright 706 So. 2d 1386 La. 1997
727 , 58 L.Ed.2d 708 (1978); -28 (La.), cert denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
State v. Prince 688 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
(emphasis added), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: It is improper conduct for either the prosecution or the defense knowingly to call a witness who will claim a privilege, for the purpose of impressing upon the jury the fact of the claim of privilege.
State v. Gerard 685 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
In addressing the issue of whether it is permissible to allow a witness to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege in the presence of the jury, the Louisiana Supreme Court, cert.
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
State v. Chambers 666 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Bourque 636 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Rideau, 249 La.
State v. Taylor 621 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Comment, Disclosure of Medical Information Under Louisiana and Federal Law, 65 Tul.
State v. Brown 619 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Hall 602 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Ducre 596 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
However, in an earlier case, cert.
State v. Mayer 589 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Jones 559 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
In addressing the issue of whether it is permissible to allow a witness to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege in the presence of the jury, the Louisiana Supreme Court, cert.
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
Defendant *1337 as cases in which this court condemned such a practice.
State v. McElroy 553 So. 2d 456 La. 1989
State v. Taylor 550 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
State v. Rideau, 249 La.
State v. Barrett 544 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Defendant attempts to support this contention by quoting part of the language of a cert.
State v. Hereford 518 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the defendant went to the apartment of a sister of a minister to pawn a watch.
Jones v. Gillen 504 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by