Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hardtner v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co., 189 So. 365.

16 citing documents.

Funderburk v. Millers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of Texas 228 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Plaintiff-appellant argues that it is settled that negligence cannot be imputed to bar recovery, citing Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.
Hebert v. North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. 204 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
NOTES [1] For a thorough discussion of this issue see Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
Willis v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 185 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
1st Cir. 1962); Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
Ard v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 148 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ; Burge v. Windolph, La.App., .
Grimes v. American Motorists Insurance Co. 145 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Co., La.App., , which in turn based such a statement upon the case of Costa v. Yochim, 104 La.
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Allen 132 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Williams v. Marionneaux 116 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
308 ; see also, Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, La.App., at page 370."
McCullin v. State 94 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
25 , ; Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ; Cuneo v. Waddell, La.App., 189 So.
Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Wallace 92 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
It was stated by this court in Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., , 370: "The only way or theory upon which negligence of one person may be imputed to another is under that of agency; * * * This court likewise held in Manley v. Hammons, La.App., , that the negligence of a father in the operation of a son’s automobile could not be imputed to the son, who was not concerne
Spurlock v. Boyce-Harvey MacHinery 90 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
308 ; see also, Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, La.App., , at page 370.
Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Insurance Co. 88 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
1127 , June 7, 1954; Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., , certiorari denied; see also McHenry *435 v. American Employers' Ins.
Gaines v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 86 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
1127 ; Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., , certiorari denied; see also McHenry v. American Employers Insurance Co., 206 La.
McDowell v. National Sur. Corp. 68 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
70 , ; Id., La.App., ; Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., and Scarborough v. St.
Gabriel v. United Theatres, Inc. 59 So. 2d 127 La. 1952
740 ; Hardtner v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ; Payne v. Georgetown Lumber Co., supra.
West v. Ray 26 So. 2d 221 La. 1946
This language was quoted with approval in Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ; Cuneo v. Waddell, La.App., 189 So.
Lacour v. Ferguson 6 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
The case of Hardtner v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company, La.App., , relied on by the appellant, seems to bear no relation whatever to the same point and we therefore conclude that the trial court was correct in following the ruling laid down in the other two cases in distributing the awards as made between the two defendant insurance companies.