No. 57401
Precedential
Processed
Duhon v. Saloom
Also decided on this docket: La., February 6, 1976 325 So. 2d 794
Duhon v. Saloom, 325 So. 2d 794 (La. 1976).
Cited by
- LeCompte v. State DHHR-So. LA. Med. Center 723 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Labbe Serv. Garage Inc. v. LBM Distributors, Inc. 650 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Abrams v. Herbert 590 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n 567 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Hero Lands Co. v. Borello 459 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Reed v. General Motors Corp. 400 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Finch v. Lake 396 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Lynch v. Foster 376 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
- Nathan v. Carter 367 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Lott v. Haley 363 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co. 261 La. 1080
Opinion text
DIXON, J., is of the opinion the Court of Appeal has misinterpreted Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080 , 262 So.2d 328 and the factual issue on the *795 plea of prescription should have been submitted to the jury. CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion this writ should be granted. DENNIS, J., is of the view that writ should be granted.