DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Greer v. Ware, 187 So. 842.

20 citing documents.

  • Gleason v. Posey 229 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Vander v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. 192 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Porter v. Barron 185 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Greer v. Ware, La.App., ; Fuld v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 178 So.
  • Lagarde v. Smith 169 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    * to use the road in the usual way in keeping with the laws of the road, and until he has been made aware of the presence of such rear car by signal or otherwise, he has a right to assume that there is no other vehicle in close proximity in his rear, or, if there is one there, it is under such control as not to interfere with his free use of the road in any lawful manner.” Greer v. Ware, La.App., .
  • Foster v. Phoenix Insurance Company 146 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Greer v. Ware, La.App., ; Fuld v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 178 So.
  • Little v. Hughes 136 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    App., , concerned an overtaking vehicle attempting to pass a school bus which was being operated down the middle of a gravel road.
  • Deshotels v. United States Fire Insurance Company 132 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Greer v. Ware, La.App., ; Crow v. Alesi, La.App., .
  • Gorum v. Southwest Casualty Insurance 131 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    1 Cir., 1952, , writ of certiorari denied, the court quoted from Greer v. Ware, La.App., , as follows: “ ‘We quote the following from the Greer case ( 187 So.
  • Billiot v. Noble Drilling Corporation 109 So. 2d 96 La. 1959
    t to use the road in the usual way in keeping with the laws of the road, and until he has been made aware of the presence of such rear car by signal or otherwise, he has a right to assume that there is no other vehicle in close proximity in his rear, or, if there is one there, it is under such control as not to interfere with his free use of the road in any lawful manner.” Greer v. Ware, La.App., .
  • Goutierrez v. Travelers Insurance Company 107 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Greer v. Ware, La.App., ; Fuld v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 178 So.
  • Johnson v. Wilson 97 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Pinchera v. Employers Casualty Co. 73 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
  • Forsyth v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 58 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    v. Ware, La.App., , which cites Stevens v. Dean, 6 La.App.
  • Cartimiglia v. Manuel 55 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    In Greer v. Ware, La.App., , a school bus in front failed to yield the right of way to a truck in the rear and a collision occurred when the driver of the second truck tried to pass anyhow.
  • Crow v. Alesi 55 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    "That rule is expressly recognized in many cases, notably Greer v. Ware, La.App., ; Fuld v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., 178 So.
  • Jones v. Miscar 34 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Cooper v. Garrett 6 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Weitkam v. Johnston 5 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    That rule is expressly recognized in many cases, notably Greer v. Ware, La.App., ; Fuld v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., 178 So.
  • Odom v. Ware 187 So. 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Ware, , decided by us this day, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, with costs.
  • Barrow v. Ware 187 So. 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    v. Samuel A. (Jinks) Ware, , decided by us this day, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, with-costs.