Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clark v. De Beer, 188 So. 517.
-
Arnold v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
236 So. 2d 584
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
657 ; Clark v. DeBeer, La.App., ; Seiner v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company, La.App., and Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App., , and concluded by adopting with approval the following observations : “ ‘ “We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
-
Sittig v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
149 So. 2d 424
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
657 ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., ; Seiner v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company, La.App., and Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App., , and concluded by adopting with approval the following observations: “ ‘ “We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
-
Dilworth v. Roberts
138 So. 2d 453
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
657 ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., ; Seiner v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company, La.App., and Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App., , and concluded by adopting with approval the following observations: “ ‘We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
-
Homeland Insurance Co. of America v. Marshall
138 So. 2d 237
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
657 ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., ; Seiner v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., and Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., ).
-
Le Beau v. Baton Rouge Bus Co.
136 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
657 ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., ; Seiner v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company, La.App., and Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App., , and concluded by adopting with approval the following observations: "`We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
-
Youngblood v. Robison
118 So. 2d 431
La. 1960
657 ; Clark v. DeBeer, La.App., ; Seiner v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company, La.App., and Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App., , and concluded by adopting with approval the following observations: “ ‘We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
-
Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Co.
114 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
decided by the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit.
-
Duree v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS
96 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
2 Cir., , certiorari denied; Saks v. Eichel, La.App.
-
Stevens v. Delanoix
96 So. 2d 844
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Co. v. Schouest, La.App., ; Clark v. DeBeer, La.App., ; Roll Osborne & Sons, Inc. v. Howatt, La.App., 167 So.
-
Duree v. State ex rel. Department of Institutions
96 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
2 Cir., , certiorari denied; Saks v. Eichel, La.App.
-
White v. Travelers Insurance Company
94 So. 2d 564
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
2d 739 ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., ; Roll Osborne & Sons, Inc. v. Howatt, La.App., 167 So.
-
Stevenson v. Williams
76 So. 2d 345
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
decided by the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit.
-
De Jean v. Hattier
65 So. 2d 623
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
144 , , , in which the Court • of Appeal for the Second Circuit commented upon the obligation which, in that case, was placed upon a woman who drove her car into an intersection under the protection of a green light, — in other' words, who had the right of way.
-
Lawrence v. Sansone
48 So. 2d 281
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
in which the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit said: “She (the motorist) observed no one approaching, so she directed and continued her attention in front of her and proceeded forward.
- O'Connor v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. 40 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Sample v. Strait
36 So. 2d 856
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
decided by the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit.
-
Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc.
24 So. 2d 292
La. 1945
decided by the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit.
-
Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.
192 So. 774
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
195 ; and Clark *780 v. DeBeer, La.App., .