DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bourque v. Duplechin, 334 So. 2d 230.

19 citing documents.

  • Lopez v. Evans 992 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3rd Cir.), writ denied, (the three-year prescriptive period applicable to suits on open account accrues three years after the last purchase or payment on the open account); Ford Marketing Corporation, (La.App.
  • Billy Broussard v. John S. Jester, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir.), writ refused, (La.App.
  • Broussard v. Jester 876 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir.), writ refused, (La.App.
  • Anders v. Andrus 773 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir), writ refused, writ not considered
  • Pommier v. ABC Ins. Co. 715 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Brown v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 715 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    3 Cir.), writ refused, the duty owed by a professor to a volunteer student donating blood was equivalent to the duty owed by a physician to his patient in the same circumstances.
  • Hebert v. LaRocca 704 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir.), writ refused, (holding a biology professor, who approved and supervised the withdrawal of blood from volunteer students, liable).
  • Landreneau v. Duplechin 595 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    3d Cir.1976), writ refused
  • Parmelee v. Kline 579 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    3rd Cir. 1976), writ refused the Third Circuit concluded a university biology professor was negligent in failing to give proper instructions to a student and in failing to provide proper facilities for that student's taking blood samples in a research project.
  • Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 562 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    App. 3 Cir.1976), writ refused, Harris v. State, Through Huey P. Long Memorial Hospital, (La.App.
  • Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR. 564 So. 2d 654 La. 1990
  • Williamson v. Historic Hurstville Ass'n 556 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    (1976); writ not considered (1976).
  • Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic 514 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir.1976), writ denied, (where a professor of biology who undertakes a project which included the performance of a medical function, i.e., the drawing of blood, was held to the standard of a medical technician); and Favalora v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, (La.App.
  • Boudreaux v. Panger 481 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    App.3d Cir.1976), writ refused
  • Pique v. Saia 450 So. 2d 654 La. 1984
    3 Cir.1976), writ not considered , writ denied ; (La.App.
  • Texas Industries, Inc. v. Roach 426 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    3d Cir.1976), writ refused, First Nat.
  • Storey v. Lambert's Limbs & Braces, Inc. 426 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    3d Cir.1976), writ refused, .
  • Citizen v. Theodore Daigle and Bro., Inc. 418 So. 2d 598 La. 1982
    App. 3 Cir. 1976) writ refused ; writ not considered, , there was a battery, but the battery was not preceded by an intentional assault.
  • Daniel v. ST. FRANCIS CABRINI HOSP. ETC. 415 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    3 Cir. 1976), writ denied, as authority for the proposition that nurses and medical technicians who undertake to perform medical services are subject to the same rules relating to the duty of care and liability as are physicians in the performance of professional services.