Washington v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 2, 1973 285 So. 2d 288; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 13, 1977 345 So. 2d 533; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 3, 1963 154 So. 2d 480
Washington v. Singer Sewing Machine Co., 10 Teiss. 270 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1913).
Opinion text
His Honor, EMILE GfODCHAUX, rendered the opinion and decree of the 'Court as follows: This case is founded upon a cause of action similar to that considered in Greenlee vs. Singer Sewing Machine Co., No. 5851 of our docket, this day decided; and the facts, issues and principles involved are substantially the same. v *271 Opinion and decree, June 2nd, 1913. Rehearing refused, June 26th, 1913. Writ denied, September 27th, 1913. In fact it differs from the cited case in two particulars only; one being that the admissibility of plaintiff’s testimony herein is not questioned; and the second being that the circumstances surrounding the forcible removal of the sewing machine in the present instance are more aggravated, the plaintiff herein being at the time in a delicate condition. While this circumstance apparently produced no ill results, it justifies an increase of the amount of the judgment. It is accordingly ordered that the judgment appealed from he amended by increasing the same to the sum of three hundred ($300.00) dollars, and as thus amended, it is affirmed at appellant’s costs. Amended.