No. 58732
Precedential
Processed
State v. Schamburge
Also decided on this docket: La., April 11, 1977 344 So. 2d 997
State v. Schamburge, 349 So. 2d 247 (La. 1977).
Cited by
- Paul Hyde, Inc. v. Richard 854 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Serv., Inc. 657 So. 2d 1307 La. 1995
- First South Prod. Cr. v. Georgia-Pacific 585 So. 2d 545 La. 1991
- Wilkin v. Dev Con Builders, Inc. 561 So. 2d 66 La. 1990
- Southern St. Masonry v. JA Jones Const. 507 So. 2d 198 La. 1987
- Cahn Elec. Co., Inc. v. Robert E. McKee, Inc. 490 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Interstate School Supply Co. v. Wilson 368 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 349 So. 2d 811 not in our corpus
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. The question of timeliness of the application for rehearing is an issue; nevertheless, the resolution of that issue would be fruitless because the application is not meritorious. The issue in State v. Anderson, La., 349 So.2d 811 , rehearing denied this day, is not before the court in this case. SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the application is untimely and should not be considered. Questions arising out of the timeliness issue are properly the subject of post conviction remedy.