No. 5891 Precedential Denied Processed

Sandrock v. Ayo

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed November 30, 1973 · 287 So. 2d 209

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 3, 1963 154 So. 2d 471; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 19, 1913 10 Teiss. 314; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 13, 1977 345 So. 2d 237

Cited by

Ward v. Southern Farm Bureau Insurance 306 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Floyd v. Silvers 303 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974

Opinion text

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING In this matter two applications for rehearing have been filed, one by the plaintiffs-appellees and the other by the defendants-appellants. Plaintiffs-appellees suggest that we may have mistakingly assessed costs of the appeal against them. The point is well taken. As- the judgment appealed from was affirmed, and as there is no other consideration which might cause us to cast the appellees for costs, we intended to so cast the appellants and did the opposite inadvertently. Accordingly, our original decree is recast so as to read as follows: The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal to be borne by the defendants-appellants. As we adhere to our original opinion and decree in all other respects, both applications for rehearings are denied. Decree recast; rehearings denied.