Lopez v. Southern Natural Gas Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 13, 1977 345 So. 2d 260; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 1, 1963 155 So. 2d 74; La., March 15, 1879 31 La. 224
Lopez v. Southern Natural Gas Co., 287 So. 2d 211 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973).
Cited by
- Joseph v. Wasserman 194 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Slaughter v. ARCO Chemical Company 931 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Traigle 436 So. 2d 530 La. 1983
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Clark v. Cottage Builders, Inc. 237 La. 157
- 1 So. 361 not in our corpus
- State v. Roshto 169 La. 251
Opinion text
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. Defendant, on rehearing, correctly calls to our attention that we erroneously stated the minutes in the instant case were signed by the trial judge. The minute entry shows that they were not. However, we have been unable to find any statutory authority or jurisprudence which indicates that failure by the trial judge to sign the minutes invalidates or places less efficacy on the entry. In Clark v. Cottage Builders, Inc., 237 La. 157 , 110 So.2d 562 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated in citing State v. Lazarus, 39 La.Ann. 142 , 1 So. 361 , 368: “ * * * In our jurisprudence, the minutes of the court have always been clothed *214 with an authenticity which borders on sanctity.” See also State v. Roshto, 169 La. 251 , 125 So. 67, 68 . Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the result reached in our original opinion is correct. The Application for Rehearing is denied.