Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kanuk v. Pohlmann, 341 So. 2d 420.

34 citing documents.

Mona Lisa J. Benjamin v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
4th Cir.1976), writ denied, : The purpose of the C.C.P.
Lawrence Wilson Kingsley v. Ann Elizabeth Lange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
4 Cir.1976), writ denied, ).
Charles R. Talen, II v. Rhino Rhencovators, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4 Cir.1976), writ denied, ).
Nunez v. Burgos 215 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4th Cir. 1976), writ denied, (La.
Succession of Linda Aymond Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 1976), writ denied, set forth the reasoning behind the liberal construction of Article 561: 1 Article 561 was amended in 1997 to change the abandonment period from five to three years.
A & B Bolt & Supply, Inc. v. Whitco Supply, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 1976), writ denied, (La.
A & B Bolt & Supply, Inc. v. Whitco Supply, L.L.C. 167 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir.1976)), writ denied, (footnote omitted).
Bell v. Louisiana State Police 168 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4th Cir.1976), writ denied, ).
Byron P. Guillory, Et Ux. v. Pelican Real Estate, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 1976), writ denied, ).
Guillory v. Pelican Real Estate, Inc. 143 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir.1976), unit denied, ).
Windham v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government 187 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir.1976), writ denied
Terry and Debra Carter v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4th Cir.1976), writ denied, : The purpose of the C.C.P.
Deborah Jean Willet Gravlee v. Mitch Gravlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4th Cir. 1976), writ denied, ).
Gravlee v. Gravlee 79 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4th Cir.1976), writ denied, ).
Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C. 79 So. 3d 978 La. 2011
4 Cir.1976), writ denied, ).
Martin v. Decker 985 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir.1976), writ denied, (filing of an unsigned pleading is a "step" in the prosecution or defense of the claim that prevents abandonment of the action); Berglund v. F.W.
State, Dept. of Transp. v. Cole Oil 822 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
4th Cir.1976), writ denied, Johnson v. Berg Mechanical Industries, 35,290 (La.App.2d Cir.12/19/01), , writ denied, 02-0240 (La.4/26/02), ; Sullivan v. Cabral, 32,454 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/99), , writ denied, 99-3324 (La.1/28/00), .
Reed v. Finklestein 807 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir.1976), writ denied, are not persuasive.
Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 785 So. 2d 779 La. 2001
4th Cir.1976), writ denied, : The purpose of the C.C.P.
Willey v. Roberts 664 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1976), writ denied
Viesel v. Republic Ins. Co. 665 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1976), writ denied
Jones v. Phelps 665 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1976), writ denied
Picone v. Lyons 653 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4 Cir.1976), writ denied, are not persuasive.
Maddie v. Fidelity National Bank 641 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
4th 1976), writ denied, the Fourth Circuit found that an unsigned motion to set for trial was a step in the prosecution which precluded a finding of abandonment.
Freedlander, Inc. v. Certain 623 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1976), writ denied we held: The purpose of the C.C.P.
Kambur v. Kambur 583 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
4th Cir.1976), writ denied
Shulver v. Slocum 566 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
4th Cir.1976), writ denied
Gibson v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. 485 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
4th Cir.1977) writ denied (La.
Fontenot v. Blue Cross Ass'n 485 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
4th Cir.1976), writs refused, ; Highlands Ins.
Newman v. Chamber of Commerce of Kentwood 462 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1976), writ denied
Pointe Coupee Elec. Mem. Corp. v. Mounger 447 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
4th Cir. 1976), writ denied
Pelto Oil Co. v. Collector of Revenue 424 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
4th Cir.1977), writs denied, at 758 as follows: “The purpose of the C.C.P.
Cox v. Southern Colonial Inv., Inc. 393 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1 Cir. 1976), writ denied, McDowell Well Service, (La.App.
Murphy v. Hurdle Planting & Livestock Co. 364 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
4th Cir. 1976), writ denied .