DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corp. v. Edwards, 345 So. 2d 904.

13 citing documents.

  • Exxon Pipeline Co. v. LeBlanc 763 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3d Cir.), writ denied, were traversed by seven existing pipelines, it did not indicate whether the additional parcels of land which were expropriated were within the preexisting pipeline servitudes.
  • Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 763 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Gullatt v. Newell Industries, Inc. 688 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    2d Cir.1977), writ denied (La.
  • Lewis v. Saucer 653 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    writ denied citing Merritt v. Hays, 237 La.
  • Greer v. State 616 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    2d Cir.1977), writ denied, Succession of Jones v. Jones, supra .
  • ANR Pipeline Co. v. Succession of Bailey 558 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    3d Cir.), writ denied, as well as other Third Circuit cases which follow the general rule that where other comparable sales are available to show the fair market value of land expropriated, comparable sales of similar servitudes to expropriating authorities are not controlling.
  • Rogers v. Haughton Timber Co., Inc. 503 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2d Cir.1977) writ denied
  • Succession of Jones v. Jones 486 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    writ not considered writ denied
  • Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene 406 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    writ refused, writ refused, Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Fruge, supra.
  • Bielawski v. Landry 397 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    2nd Cir. 1977), writ denied, (1977).
  • Hollingsworth v. Edwards 397 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    2d Cir. 1977), writ refused Reformation of instruments is an equitable remedy and lies only to correct mistakes or errors in written instruments when such instruments, as written, do not express the true contract of the parties.
  • Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. v. Rosteet 389 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    3rd Cir. 1977), writ refused, (La.
  • State v. Underwood 353 So. 2d 1013 La. 1977
    : We granted a limited remand "for consideration by the trial judge of relator's request for presentence report data in light of La.C.Cr.P.