Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Linner, 353 So. 2d 969.

108 citing documents.

Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Harris v. Carter, 33,951 (La.App.
Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Harris v. Carter, 33,951 (La.App.
Istre v. Meche 916 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Russell Paulette Lebouef Istre v. Daniel Meche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Paul Zerbe v. Town of Carenco, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Zerbe v. Town of Carencro 884 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Penn v. St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office 843 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Cloy v. Lee 807 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
| gPlaintiff relies on three case in support of her argument that the officers in this case used excessive force against her: (La.App.
Harris v. Eckerd Corp. 796 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Plessy, supra; Anderson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 95-1026 (La.App.
Glover v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Police Department 803 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In Kyle v. City of New Orleans the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a standard of conduct for police officers to follow when making an arrest.
Trahan v. City of Scott 802 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Westmoreland v. City of Natchitoches 771 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Harris v. Carter 768 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
and Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94), .
Rodriguez v. Deen 759 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Wolfe v. Wiener Enterprises, Inc., 94-2409 (La.1/13/95)
McDaniel v. Green 755 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), , (La.
Saucier v. Players Lake Charles, LLC 751 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
the supreme court sets forth several factors to consider in making a determination of whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances.
Kelly v. West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materials 745 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Barry v. Dennis, 93-1301 (La.App.
Plessy v. Hayes Motor Co., Inc. 742 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Anderson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 95-1026 (La.App.
Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
Wells v. Johnston, 52 La.
Russell v. Noullet 721 So. 2d 868 La. 1998
n. 7 (La.1979), citing, (La.App.
Courville v. City of Lake Charles 720 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
See Stroik, ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94)
Cooks v. Rodenbeck 711 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Stroik v. Ponseti 699 So. 2d 1072 La. 1997
In Mathieu , this court held the reasonableness of the officers' actions under the particular circumstances of a a Fourth Amendment case which articulated a standard of conduct for police officers to follow when making an arrest.
Dyer v. City of New Orleans 700 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Determination of reasonableness under the circumstances, in turn
Stroik v. Ponseti 683 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
To determine the reasonableness of policeman's conduct in approaching and attempting to disarm a suspect, the breach of duty element, the legal test is one of reasonableness under the totality of the circumstances, and applied to duty/risk analysis in Mathieu, supra, 646 So.2d at 321-323 .
Anderson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 675 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Kyle v. City of New Orleans (La.App.
Lewis v. Kahn 670 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the use of force by police officers, when making an arrest, is a legitimate police function.
Prisk v. Palazzo 668 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Richardson v. Henderson 651 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Wolfe v. Wiener Enterprises, Inc. 648 So. 2d 1293 La. 1995
art. 213(3) on several occasions
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 646 So. 2d 318 La. 1994
Reese v. City of Baton Rouge 644 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Barry v. Dennis 633 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 632 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
LaBauve v. State 618 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1977), reversed and remanded on other grounds, on remand on the issue of quantum, (La.App.
Jack v. Johnson 618 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Evans v. Hawley 559 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Fisher v. Dept. of Public Safety 555 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Harrison v. Phillips 539 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Ross v. Sheriff of Lafourche Parish 479 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Mitchell v. Windham 469 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Richard v. State, through Department of Public Safety, (La.App.
Vincent v. State Through Dept. of Corrections 468 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Distinguished Hunt v. Chapman 458 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coutee v. American Druggist Ins. Co. of Cincinnati 453 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Bender v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket, Inc. 452 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
False arrest and imprisonment occur when one arrests or restrains another against his will without a warrant or other statutory authority, and it is fundamental that custodial arrest of a shoplifter by a merchant is without statutory authority unless predicated upon reasonable cause to believe that the arrestee has committed theft.
Johnson v. State Through Dept. of P. Safety 451 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
O'CONNER v. Hammond Police Dept. 439 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Richard v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety 436 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Smith on Behalf of Smith v. City of Kenner 428 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
*1174 (La.1977), excessive force in an arrest was the complaint.
Gerard v. Parish of Jefferson 424 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Barfield v. Marron, 222 La.