No. 60124
Precedential
Reversed
Processed
State v. Rush
Also decided on this docket: La., September 16, 1977 349 So. 2d 874
State v. Rush, 352 So. 2d 1282 (La. 1977).
The holding in the court’s own words
Finding no evidence of criminal damage to property, we conclude that the trial judge erred in denying defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Defendant was convicted of simple criminal damage to property, La.R.S. 14:56. Finding no evidence of criminal damage to property, we conclude that the trial judge erred in denying defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are reversed and the defendant discharged. [[Image here]]