No. 60340
Precedential
Writ denied
Processed
Redemer v. Hollis
Redemer v. Hollis, 350 So. 2d 897 (La. 1977).
Cited by
Criticized in 1
- Hartec Corp. v. GSE Associates, Inc. 91 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LeRouge 995 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Rabalais v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 950 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 934 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- John Hebert, Et Ux. v. Rapides Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Hussey v. Russell 934 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Hays v. State 856 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Boutte v. Kelly 863 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Davis v. Witt 831 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Powell v. Regional Transit Authority 695 So. 2d 1326 La. 1997
- Hasha v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 651 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Redemer v. Hollis 347 So. 2d 48
Opinion text
In re: Lee F. Redemer applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 347 So.2d 48 . Writ denied. The result is correct.