Bordelon v. Dauzat
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 2, 1962 144 So. 2d 701; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 5, 1930 126 So. 565; La., May 15, 1868 20 La. 376
Bordelon v. Dauzat, 145 So. 2d 45 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962).
Cited by
- Dauzat v. Bordelon 145 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Dauzat v. Bordelon 145 So. 2d 41
Opinion text
TATE, Judge. This is a suit to cancel a mortgage on the ground that there was no consideration for the note secured thereby and also that the petitioner was misled into signing it by misrepresentation and error. It is a companion suit to Dauzat v. Bordelon, La.App., 145 So.2d 41 , rendered this same date, a foreclosure suit by the holder of the note which was secured by the mortgage sought to be cancelled herein. . For the reasons stated in the cited companion suit, by which we concluded that the note in question was supported by valid consideration, the judgment herein ordering cancellation of the mortgage pursuant to the present plaintiff’s demand is reversed; and the present plaintiff’s suit is dismissed at his cost. Reversed. On Application for Rehearing. En Banc. Rehearing denied.