Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 358 So. 2d 1263.
- State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- State v. Royal 807 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
-
State v. Bradford
700 So. 2d 1046
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.02/28/96)
- State v. Thomas 680 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Hall 616 So. 2d 664 La. 1993
- State v. Watts 596 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. White 495 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Jarreau 476 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Sexton
477 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
A good review of the purpose of allowing wide latitude in voir dire examination and of the trial court’s : La.
- State v. Duplessis 457 So. 2d 604 La. 1984
- State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 610 La. 1984
- State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Simmons 443 So. 2d 512 La. 1983
-
State v. David
425 So. 2d 1241
La. 1983
The accused's right to "full voir dire examination" includes the right to make such inquiries of prospective jurors as will enable him to secure his constitutional rights, not only by showing grounds for challenges for cause, but also by eliciting facts which will empower him intelligently to exercise his right of peremptory challenge, and the right to examine a prospective juror challenged for cause by the prosecution in order to demonstrate his impartiality.
- State v. Perry 420 So. 2d 139 La. 1982
- State v. Frith 412 So. 2d 1000 La. 1982
- State v. St. Amant 413 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
-
State v. Morris
397 So. 2d 1237
La. 1981
State v. Williams, supra
-
State v. Claiborne
397 So. 2d 486
La. 1981
1978); State v. Hills, 241 La.
- State v. Sylvester 388 So. 2d 1155 La. 1980
- State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
- State v. Bergeron 371 So. 2d 1309 La. 1979
- State v. Dixon 365 So. 2d 1310 La. 1978
- State v. Hayes 364 So. 2d 923 La. 1978