Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., 195 So. 638.

16 citing documents.

  • Withers v. Timber Products, Inc. 574 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    App., , and cases therein cited."
  • Pflieger v. Haws 180 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    See Middleton v. H. M. Stevens Lumber Co., La.App., ; Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, La.App., .
  • Himes v. Avinger 85 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    "The case of Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., La.App., , is practically on all-fours with the present case.
  • Amyx v. Henry & Hall 79 So. 2d 483 La. 1955
    508 ; Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., La.App., ; McDaniel v. Federal Underwriters, La.App., 2 So.
  • Shumake v. Home Indemnity Co. 68 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    ot apply so as to make Winford liable for any derelictions of Milam.” Counsel say that the courts have, in certain cases, experienced some difficulty in determining whether the relation between plaintiff and defendant was that of employee and employer or principal and independent contractor, but that the facts here alleged fall within the pattern of Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., La.App., , Collins v. Smith, La.App., and Deason v. Coal Operators Casualty Company, La.App., , and the cases
  • Middleton v. H. M. Stevens Lumber Co. 46 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    App., , and cases therein cited.
  • Distinguished Frazier v. Malone 45 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1950
    508 ; Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., et al., La.App., ; McDaniel v. Federal Underwriters et al., La.App., .” *373 The case before us is distinguishable from the case of Murphy v. Tremont Lumber Company, La.App., , and other similar cases cited by defend; ants in that Frazier had no contract to process or haul wood from a designated or specified tr
  • Hanchey v. Consolidated Underwriters 43 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Collins v. Smith et al., La.
  • Murphy v. Tremont Lumber Co. 22 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., ; McDaniel v. Federal Underwriters et al., La.
  • Nesmith v. Reich Bros. 14 So. 2d 767 La. 1943
    But it would be impossible to distinguish the decision rendered in this case from the decision rendered in Alexander v. Latimer, or from the decision rendered in Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, La.App., .
  • Collins v. Smith 13 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    508 ; Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., et al., La.App., ; McDaniel v. Federal Underwriters et al., La.App., .
  • Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc. 9 So. 2d 445 La. 1942
  • Nesmith v. Reich Bros. 14 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    The case of Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., La.App., et al, , is practically on all-fours with the present case.
  • Durant v. Industrial Lumber Co. 6 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    697 ; Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., et al., La.App., .
  • Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill 8 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • McDaniel v. Federal Underwriters 2 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    697 ; Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc., La.App., .